Supreme Court Pauses Mosque Survey Case in Sambhal After Violence, Orders High Court Hearing
The Supreme Court of India has taken significant steps to ensure peace and order in Uttar Pradesh’s Sambhal following recent violence related to the controversial survey of the Mughal-era Jama Masjid. Acting on a plea filed by the Shahi Idgah Committee, the apex court directed the trial court to pause any proceedings regarding the mosque survey until the committee has the opportunity to approach the High Court. This decision comes amid heightened tensions that resulted in the loss of five lives during clashes sparked by the court-mandated survey.
Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna, along with Justice PV Sanjay Kumar, issued clear instructions that the report prepared by the commissioner who conducted the survey must remain sealed and unopened until further notice. Emphasizing the importance of maintaining peace, the bench urged all parties to focus on harmony while legal proceedings continue. The justices instructed the High Court to list the committee’s petition within three working days, ensuring that the matter receives prompt attention.
The survey itself has been a source of heated debate, with claims suggesting that the Jama Masjid was built by Mughal emperor Babar in 1526 after allegedly demolishing a pre-existing temple. This has fueled a contentious atmosphere, further amplified by similar disputes occurring in other parts of the country. Senior advocate Huzefa Ahmadi, representing the mosque committee, expressed concerns about the potential repercussions of the trial court’s order, describing it as capable of inciting “great public mischief.” He pointed out that this case is part of a broader trend, where surveyors are quickly appointed in similar disputes.
The Supreme Court has assured that it remains neutral in the matter and has not expressed any opinion on its merits. It also clarified that the committee’s plea would be re-listed during the week beginning January 6, 2025, keeping the current petition active. The bench reiterated the importance of forming mediation committees under Section 43 of the Mediation Act to resolve such sensitive issues amicably.
Meanwhile, the district administration in Sambhal has been directed to prioritize peace and harmony. The Supreme Court’s measured approach reflects its intent to de-escalate the situation while allowing the legal process to proceed fairly. This case underscores the delicate balance between addressing historical grievances and maintaining societal stability in a diverse country like India.
